![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||
Beyond the Numbers: NCCI's Impact from Artist to Student to Campus to Community While the numbers above indicate the significant breadth of NCCI's reach, the real depth of its impact can only be conveyed by considering the extent of the changes that it engendered and the ways in which students, faculty and artists grew from their experiences. As students had rare, maybe even once-in-a-lifetime, opportunities to reconstruct and perform work of great artists such as Antony Tudor, Isadora Duncan, Pearl Primus, Jack Cole, Merce Cunningham, José Limón and Charles Weidman, they learned the roots of their own dance history. As they participated in creating new work by contemporary artists such as Ronald K. Brown, Wendy Rogers, John Jasperse, Jawole Willa Jo Zollar, and Tere O'Connor, students learned about aesthetics, techniques and goals of artists working today and explored their own creative voices. As they developed close relationships with professional artists, young dancers were inspired to reexamine the role that dance plays in their own lives and the broader world, and to pursue professional training, sometimes with the NCCI artists who had mentored them. As NCCI residencies progressed, the momentum that built on campuses and in communities was dramatic. Dance departments took risks that involved large project budgets and complex logistics in order to work with choreographers who, up until that time, may have been unaffordable. Outside the dance departments, cultural participation took place on many levels in the surrounding communities on and off campus: scholars provided information and context about cultures, history, trends and traditions, and the general public was enlightened about the value and diversity of artists' creative processes and the resulting products. Artists were able to build tours around their already subsidized visits to regions of the country. With the endorsement of NEA support, colleges leveraged funding through university budgets, private and government sources, and dance patrons. Local and even national press turned their attention toward campuses, resulting in coverage that ranged from college newsletters to citywide papers to The New York Times, National Public Radio, and CBS. The amount of residency activity increased exponentially as individuals and organizations joined in; students and volunteers collected tickets, ran rehearsals, took photos, wrote papers, cooked meals, transported dancers, hosted receptions and opened up their homes to visiting artists. As their students traveled from cities across the country to perform at The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, DC, college administrators turned their attention to the success of their own dance programs. A National Dialogue A sense of community and identity developed among some of the 51 grantees as they grappled with issues common to all in dance pedagogy, such as how to: mentor, pass on a legacy, encourage original thought and expression, plan residencies, mesh schedules, collaborate with each other and presenters, take risks, and revitalize the learning environment for their students. Finally, this year of activity and interaction sparked a dialogue at the national level among artists and educators as they consider future implications for dance as an art form and a curriculum-a dialogue that will likely continue on campuses, in studios, and among funders and policy makers long into the future. A number of positive results occurred for choreographers. Several of them used this opportunity with students to revise existing dances, heighten their profile, or develop original material to be refined for professional dancers. Renowned choreographer Jawole Willa Jo Zollar will focus an upcoming company season on choreographer Pearl Primus. Emerging artist Michael Thomas raised his own visibility by creating a work that was performed in a regional American College Dance Festival, and drew broader visibility at The Kennedy Center in May. And knowing that two sections of Antony Tudor's The Planets were reconstructed has prompted professional ballet companies to consider performing this long-lost work. Perhaps the most dramatic changes occurred among the students themselves. They learned that they could accomplish far more than they thought possible when they were pushed, by themselves and their mentors, to achieve a goal. When asked to reflect on what other students might learn at NCCI residencies, participating students across the country frequently responded with the same advice, which is equally valuable in the studio and beyond: Go into it with an open mind. Take a risk. Be open to new experiences because they expand your thinking. In this publication, the stories of five specific NCCI residencies are explored in some depth. These five, instructive in themselves, also are a reflection of the other 46 projects, and offer a number of insights into the overall program and its outcomes. Representing different states and dance forms, the particular projects also illuminate a few of the many issues that emerged on campuses for students, faculty and artists. These stories are only a part of a much greater mosaic of widely varied activities that took place across the country. Throughout the year, however, one outcome became consistently clear across projects, and remains so: there is much to be gained by encouraging artists to pass on the fruits of their talents and passions, and to mentor students to one day do the same. The National College Choreography Initiative is delighted to have helped set the stage for this passing on of legacies, and for the creation of new ones; it is such cultural capital that is among America's greatest assets, both for its own people and for history.
|